The death penalty,the punishment of execution sentenced to someone legally convicted of a capital crime, is a cruel punishment and should not be allowed. This is a inhumane also contradicting the laws and regulations of killing in the first place. Violent crimes have not yet been reduced by applying the death sentence so the deaths at hands are just wrong. This punishment is useless and only makes those who assist it as much of a criminal as the criminal others.       The death penalty is contradicting the law itself allowing cruel punishment done with little justification about it. The relevant legal standard is the standard set forth in the Eighth Amendment. The Constitution there forbids the ‘infliction of ‘cruel and unusual punishments.’ Amdt. 8. The Court has recognized that a ‘claim that punishment is excessive is judged not by the standards that prevailed in 1685… or when the Bill of Rights was adopted, but rather by those that currently prevail… Indeed, the Constitution prohibits various gruesome punishments that were common. The Supreme Court has addressed the question of whether the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment several times. In doing so, it has generally considered all three of the definitions of “cruel and unusual” noted above. The Court has never ruled the 8th Amendment completely rules out the use of the death penalty. That is not to say, however, that the Court might never rule in such a manner. In its decisions, the Court has explicitly stated that the meaning of the 8th Amendment can and does evolve over time as society’s norms and values change. Ruling that the death penalty is not a “cruel and unusual” punishment under the 8th Amendment, the Supreme Court has cited the 5th Amendment which the Court believes strongly implies that the Framers did not intend to prevent the use of capital punishment. The 5th Amendment guarantees that no one shall be deprived of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The clear implication is that depriving someone of his or her life is permissible under the Constitution.       The American Civil Liberties Union believes the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law.The death penalty does not contribute to the deterrence of crime. In fact, the death penalty may actually raise crime rates.Capital punishment is not a solution; it is a burden on society and does more harm than good. Many other countries have eradicated the death penalty for this reason. The countries that have abolished capital punishment have substantially lower crime rates.           The death penalty is expensive and a waste of funds setting up and pursuing an execution when the alternative is spending less money and sparing a human life having mercy on both yourself and the criminal. The death penalty diverts resources from genuine crime control measures. Spending money on the death penalty system means: Reducing the resources available for crime prevention, mental health treatment, education and rehabilitation, meaningful victims’ services, and drug treatment programs.Diverting it from existing components of the criminal justice system, such as prosecutions of drug crimes, domestic violence, and child abuse.Emergency services, creating jobs, and police & crime prevention were the three highest rated priorities for use of fiscal resources.Schools/libraries, public health, and roads/transportation also ranked higher than the death penalty.      The execution of a criminal wouldn’t only affect the people who assisted it but also tearing apart the family. The death penalty adversely affects both families of murder victims and families of the accused, according to two recent journal articles. In his Psychology Today blog, Talking About Trauma, psychologist Dr. Robert T. Muller reports that psychological studies have have found that the death penalty produces negative effects on families and friends of murder victims.      A decision taken by someone on death row to end his or her life through execution can never be consensual. Moreover, it cannot disguise the fact that the state is involved in a premeditated killing.  The death penalty claims innocent lives. Since 1973,140 people have been released from death row throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful conviction.

Post Author: admin


I'm Irvin!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out