in the late stages of a terminal illness, and their loved ones, can suffer
tremendously (and unnecessarily):

Sebire, (52-years-old) former schoolteacher and mother of three, was refused
the right to die by a French court. Sebire suffered from a disfiguring and
incurable facial tumour which caused her to lose the sense of smell, taste and finally her eyesight. Shortly after the court’s decision, she decided to
take her own life. Before she passed away she explained that if she saw
children in the street, they would run away from her petrified. ‘One
would not allow an animal to go through what I have endured’, she said. How can we make someone like this suffer? Is
this really acceptable? And why should we make a person and their family and
friends suffer when there is a much easier alternative? It is also
important to realise that those that want the patient to life, despite them
being terminally ill and in extreme pain are usually not the patients
themselves and therefore don’t know what the person is experiencing. The
current rules in Australia
require a person with great physical and/or mental suffering to continue to
endure their suffering against their wishes, which certainly cannot be right.
Ultimately not only does the person suffer, everyone around them suffers.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

laws can make people that assist
others with euthanasia go to jail:

last year, a court in Ireland rejected a person called, Marie Fleming’s
bid to commit suicide, despite multiple sclerosis (sclerosis is a disease in which the immune system eats away at the
protective covering of nerves) this reduced her
life to “irreversible agony.” At the centre of this was her husband Tom, who
was told he could face up to 14 years in prison if he assisted her in committing
suicide. In other words, Ireland’s highest court forced a woman to live in
unimaginable physical agony while her husband had to watch the person he loves
suffer daily. His only alternative was to help her relieve her pain however he
would go to prison. Any sane person would realise that this is unconventionally
cruel and inhumane, yet decisions like this happen all over the world including
in Australia.

take the case of paralysed UK resident Paul Lamb. Last month, a judge
ruled that any nurse or doctor who helps him take his own life will be
prosecuted, despite him describing his life as a “living hell.” Or the
case of Diane Pretty who was told her husband would be prosecuted if he
tried to help her avoid the horrible death she eventually had. Simply said,
laws against assisted death cause suffering on an unimaginable scale, not just
for the terminally ill but for their families as well.


Finally, Euthanasia
is properly regulated:

Developed countries like the
Netherlands have legalized euthanasia and have had solely minor problems from
this decision. Any law or system can be misused or abused, however that law and
system will invariably be refined to prevent such things from happening. In a
similar manner, it is possible to properly and effectively regulate euthanasia,
as several first world countries have done. More so because the process of
euthanasia itself as it is being argued here, needs competent consent from the
patient. It is vital to think about the protection of both the physicians as
well as the patients. The crucial component within the regulation of euthanasia
will be deciding what is considered to be euthanasia and what exactly is
considered to be murder. Adding on to that it is properly regulated, in the
Netherlands roughly two-thirds of patients who apply to be euthanized are refused.



In conclusion Euthanasia should clearly
be legalised in Australia, the victim and his or her loved ones can suffer tremendously,
current laws can make people that assist others with euthanasia go to jail and finally
euthanasia is properly regulated.

Post Author: admin


I'm Irvin!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out